Prof. Napolitano
Thoughts on "A Theory of Reading"
I have written and rewritten this first paragraph of an assessment of J. Wilhelm’s “A Theory of Teaching” more times than I care to count. I tried writing the middle first, then the end. I thought maybe sleep would help. Then, at some point, there came a very tiny “aha” moment and here it is. Wilhelm introduces the theories of teaching reading, I read, he describes the best ways to teach, I read more, he compares techniques, I am still reading. Then on Page 54, he shares the “Six Methods for Teaching Reading Strategies”. And there it is.
Perhaps this text exceeds my own “zone of Proximal Development”. I was certainly frustrated with this material. And it clearly reminded me of my high school and first college experience. We were left to our own devices in text driven classes. I was exhausted, feeling helpless, and believed I was stupid. English is my first language, I am white, middle class, grew up in a liberal highly educated family and community. And yet I felt inadequate. In retrospect, I reflect on that time in life and accept that I was not interested in the reading. It did not relate to the world I wanted to be in. I was not an at risk student but if a student is struggling is it not at least similar? I am in this text. It is Escher-esk. And that is why I struggled with this assignment.
M. C. Escher, 1948
Getting back to Wilhelm, here is my original questions, “Self, what did you get out of this, what can you get out of this?”
No comments:
Post a Comment